Copyright claims against AI companies just got a potential boost. A U.S. federal judge last week handed down a summary ...

A US judge has ruled in favor of Thomson Reuters in a AI training fight against Ross Intelligence, a legal AI startup, ...

Earlier this week, a federal judge rejected an AI startup's claim that using copyrighted material to train its AI system was permissible under ...

With the Trump administration’s push to establish America’s global dominance in artificial intelligence (AI), thorny questions of ...

A judge looked at possible copyright infringement defenses for Ross Intelligence and said, ‘I reject them all.’ ...

A federal judge in Delaware on Tuesday said that a former competitor of Thomson Reuters was not permitted by U.S. copyright ...

Legal experts said there are key differences in Thomson Reuters' case against Ross Intelligence and other major AI-related ...

Thomson Reuters has won an early battle in court over the question of fair use in artificial intelligence-related copyright ...

The Thomson Reuters decision has big implications for the battle between generative AI companies and rights holders.

A judge ruled Ross Intelligence copied Westlaw data without permission, in a blow to AI developer's fair use claims.

The case, filed in 2020, accused Ross Intelligence of reproducing materials from Thomson Reuters' Westlaw legal research ...

In the first AI copyright case ruling, a court concludes that training an AI system using copyrighted material isn't fair use. That will likely be cited by creators fighting other tech giants.